Flash is now unblocked in Safari.Apple, Adobe, and Flash Monday, 25 January 2010Adobe Flash Player is available on Mac OS. Tick the box for this option and select On from the When visiting other websites dropdown menu on the right. Apple dropped support for Flash Player in Safari 14, due to Flash Player's upcoming end-of-life at the end of the year.Under Plug-ins on the left, you’ll see an option saying Adobe Flash Player. 'After I updated software in system preferences' Apple released Safari 14 yesterday and it has begun to roll out to users (I got my notification earlier today).Download the uninstaller for Flash Player on the Adobe Website. One group is going to be very surprised come Wednesday.Users can uninstall Adobe Flash Flayer from their Mac. You can see both reactions represented in the thread on my piece at Hacker News. Reaction to this was polarized — typically either “duh, of course it won’t” or “no way, it has to support Flash”. The program can be supported on browsers like Internet Explorer, IE for Windows 10, Edge, Firefox, Safari, Google Chrome, and Opera.In my “ Tablet Musings” piece two weeks ago, I speculated that Apple’s imminent tablet probably won’t support Flash, for all the same reasons the iPhone doesn’t. Linux users may also download the software on their devices.
Adobe Flash Player Plugin Safari Software In SystemOn stage at the WWDC 2009 keynote address last June, Apple senior vice president of software engineering Bertrand Serlet was explaining the new web content plugin mechanism for Safari in Snow Leopard. (And good for them for asking I’m not sure what I was thinking including that without sourcing it.)Here’s the deal. The single leading sourceOf application crashes on Mac OS X is a component that AppleSeveral readers asked me for the source for my accusation contained in that last sentence, that Flash is the “leading source of application crashes on Mac OS X”. That is not true forMac OS X, and Flash is a prime example. Presumably, most of the time it’s Safari or some other browser playing Flash content. That doesn’t mean Flash somehow causes crashes in any various app. But during the week at WWDC, I confirmed with several sources at Apple who are familiar with the aggregate Crash Reporter data, and they confirmed that “plugins” was a euphemism for “Flash”.In other words, in Apple’s giant pile of aggregate crash reports — from all app crashes on all Macs from all users who click the button to send these reports to Apple — Flash accounts for more of them than anything else. As for why such crash resistance was worth implementing, Serlet explained that, based on data from the Crash Reporter application built into Mac OS X — the thing that asks if you’d like to send crash data to Apple after a crash — the most frequent cause of crashes across all of Mac OS X are (or at least were, pre-Snow Leopard) “plugins”.Serlet didn’t name any specific guilty plugins. Serlet’s stated reason on stage was “crash resistance”, as mentioned above. You get a broken little rectangle in the page where the plugin was executing, but the browser itself stays running.Apple did this for two reasons. So if Apple wanted Safari to be 64-bit in Snow Leopard (and they did), they needed to run 32-bit plugins like Flash in a separate process.Maybe you don’t believe Apple that web content plugins are the most frequent source of crashes on Mac OS X. Apple doesn’t have the source code to Flash, so only Adobe can make Flash Player 64-bit compatible. (This is true for other third-party web content plugins, like Silverlight, but Flash is the only one that ships as part of the system.) 64-bit apps cannot run 32-bit plugins. Flash Player is only available as a 32-bit binary. And, if Flash Player for Mac OS X actually is poorly-engineered overly-buggy code, well, that’s even worse.But there’s another reason why Apple created this new external process architecture for web content plugins in Snow Leopard: it was the only way they could ship Safari and the WebKit framework as 64-bit binaries. Think of it as a formula like this:Total crashes = (crashing bugs) × (actual use)Flash’s number and severity of crashing bugs could well be somewhat low and it would still account for a large number of total crashes because it’s actually used all the time — by any Mac user with Flash content playing in a web page. And what happens if Apple goes to a new CPU architecture? For the components Apple controls the source code to, they can recompile for the new architecture. If they want to go 64-bit with iPhone OS, it’s entirely in Apple’s own control to do so. Instead of being able to make Flash 64-bit themselves, Apple had to engineer an entirely new plugin architecture.This is why Apple wants to control the source code to the entire OS. Flash remains 32-bit and there’s nothing Apple can do about it. So then in that case, maybe Bertrand Serlet blamed “plugin crash resistance” for political reasons, just to stick a knife in Adobe’s back, and the only reason Apple went with this external-process architecture was for the 64-bit/32-bit incompatibility.But that just shines a light on the fact that Flash is still a 32-bit binary despite the fact that Apple wants to go 64-bit system-wide. That’s cool, skepticism is good. Apple, with the iPhone, is solving the chicken and egg problem. Publishers use Flash for web video because Flash is installed on such a high percentage of clients clients support Flash because so many publishers use Flash for web video. But the best argument against Flash support is that it is harmful to the web as a whole to have something as important as video be in the hands of a single company, and the only way that’s going to change is if an open alternative becomes a compelling target for web publishers.It’s a chicken-and-egg problem. HTML, CSS, and JavaScript are all open standards, with numerous implementations, including several that are open source.The simplest argument in favor of Flash support on the iPhone (and The Tablet, and everywhere) is that Flash is, by dint of its popularity and ubiquity, part of the web. In front of meWas a kid, about nine or ten, who had an iPhone. And when you talk about other uses for Flash, you’re talking about serving as a software runtime, and whether you like it or not, Apple has a clearly stated opposition to third-party software runtimes for iPhone OS, and that policy seems to be working out pretty well for them.I was in line waiting for a coffee on Christmas day. But that’s the main thing everyone is talking about when they talk about Flash not working on the iPhone — video. This is good for everyone but Adobe.And yes, I know Flash does much more than just play video. They’re replacing it with H.264 and HTML5. If you want to show video to iPhone users, you need to use H.264.Apple isn’t trying to replace Flash with its own proprietary thing. He was frustrated and on the verge of getting pissedWith his new toy. He was squeezing it,Swiping it. He was pushing frantically at a white box onA web page with the broken plug-in symbol. Best emulator to install windows on a mac g4“That’sOkay honey,” she said, “we’ll get you a game from the App Store.”His response to this? He started working that device even harder. It won’t play your Flash games.” His mom, ignoring him up toThat point, was triggered by a stranger talking to her kid. I leaned over and said, “It won’t loadFlash. FinallyI couldn’t take it anymore. Download kumpulan mod ukts bus indonesiaIf only for theI think this anecdote, and this reader’s takeaway from it, accurately captures the feeling behind much of the “Apple has got to bend on this eventually” sentiment that’s out there.But think about it from Apple’s perspective. And thatIPhone suddenly took a huge dive in value to him.Like it or not, Apple needs to come to terms with this.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorBilly ArchivesCategories |